Backcasting can feel abstract when first encountered. To make the methodology tangible, I developed a concrete scenario centered on mental health stigma in athletics, a topic that was currently in the news. I used a Futures Wheel to map implications—placing "Athletes treated as a commodity" at the center with impacts radiating outward, organized by Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, plus Educational, Cultural, and Psychological Impacts (adapting the standard STEEP framework for the higher education audience).

I created a mock newspaper front page featuring articles that brought this problem future to life, giving participants a vivid, familiar format to understand the future we were working to avoid.

After the session, I created an alternative newspaper showing the desirable future that emerged from participants' ideation. This before-and-after newspaper pair made the backcasting concept vivid and memorable—participants could literally see the transformation from problem future to preferred future.

Throughout the presentation, I developed infographics that communicated the backcasting process visually, allowing participants to understand the methodology at a glance—critical for a short workshop where every minute counted. The materials needed to work across radically different contexts: projected slides in virtual presentation, collaborative digital whiteboards, printed worksheets for future use, and a synthesis document for reference. I maintained visual consistency through typography, color palette, and layout principles while adapting each format to its specific use case. The worksheets used simplified black-and-white versions of the color infographics, ensuring the visual language remained coherent and that participants could print and reproduce them on any printer or copier.

The choice of Jamboard was strategic: an extremely simple whiteboard tool participants could use intuitively without training.

I designed custom templates with three pages:

• Futures Cone Working Space: Page 1 featured the futures cone as the collaborative workspace, with a timeline from the present day leading to the future vision statement. Along the timeline were sticky notes with the prompt asking "What might a news headline read in this future?" to guide participants' thinking.
• Vision Statement: Page 2 presented a brief vision statement with a note to "work towards this future!"
• Problem Statement: Page 3 provided a slightly longer problem statement with a note to "work to avoid this future!"

This three-page structure guided participants through the backcasting exercise with minimal facilitator intervention—essential given the constraint of 5 facilitators supporting dozens of breakout groups.

Despite the compressed two-week timeline, the workshop successfully introduced 75 higher education leaders to a sophisticated strategic planning methodology in a way that was both engaging and immediately actionable. The comprehensive materials package equipped participants with tools they could implement independently after the Frontier Set initiative concluded. The design solutions addressed the core challenge of scale: the self-facilitating Jamboard templates and clear worksheets enabled the small facilitation team to effectively support a large, distributed virtual audience across multiple simultaneous breakout sessions.